No wages in the case of a gift transfer of company shares to secure company succession (BFH of November 20, 2024, VI R 21/22)

Jan 14, 2025
Tax

Facts of the case

As part of the company succession, the shareholders of a GmbH decided to transfer their shares to their son and several senior employees, including the plaintiff, free of charge. The aim was to ensure the long-term continuation of the company, as the son was unable to take over the management of the company alone due to other professional commitments.

The transfer was made without consideration and was not part of the employees' employment contracts. However, the tax office deemed the transfer to be taxable wages in accordance with Section 19 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 1 EStG. The plaintiff filed a lawsuit and argued that the transfer was solely for the purpose of securing the company and not as remuneration for her work.‍

Findings from the decision

Differentiation between wages and other benefits:

The BFH clarified that benefits only count as wages if they are granted in return “for” the employee's work. In this case, however, there was no connection between the transfer of shares and the work performed.

Focus on succession planning:

The transfer was exclusively intended to secure the company's succession. The involvement of the senior employees as shareholders was intended to promote the stability of the company and was not part of the remuneration.

Case-by-case assessment decisive:

The BFH emphasized that the tax classification of benefits always requires an overall assessment. Reasons such as business necessities and the objective of the transfer are decisive.

No automatic classification as wages:

Not every benefit from an employer or its shareholder to an employee is taxable wages. If there is no connection with the work performance, there is no remuneration.

Value of the company succession:

The long-term continuation of the company was the focus of the decision. The transfer was a strategic step to ensure the stability and sustainable management of the company.

Consequences for practice

This ruling strengthens legal certainty in succession planning.

Companies can ensure that benefits such as shares are not automatically treated as wages if they serve strategic or entrepreneurial purposes.

Tip: Document the purpose of the transfer precisely to avoid misunderstandings with the tax authorities.

This ruling provides a good guide for arrangements of this kind.

Tim Hoferichter

Das könnte Dir auch gefallen:

Jan 28, 2025
Tax
all
BFH enables tax-optimized management participation
Nov 5, 2024
Tax
all
Real estate transfer tax for share deals
Dec 11, 2024
Tax
all
Real estate transfer tax on the non-cash formation of a KG by transfer of shares
Oct 2, 2024
Tax
all
Generosity in cases of § 7 para. 8 sentence 1 ErbStG
Sep 19, 2024
Tax
all
A ruling by the Munich tax court (3 K 2755/22 Erb) sheds exciting light on the interplay between inheritance tax and income tax
Sep 10, 2024
Tax
all
Payments for the redemption of a conditional usufruct of company shares are not taxable
Aug 29, 2024
Tax
all
According to the Hamburg tax court, the application of the exemption rules of Section 13b para. 1 no. 3 ErbStG is possible in the case of a disproportionate contribution
Aug 22, 2024
Tax
all
Effects of the ruling of the Munich Fiscal Court (4 K 1385/23) on the practice of real estate valuation
Jan 9, 2025
Tax
all
Decision with design potential: Land under construction does not constitute harmful administrative assets
Dec 2, 2024
Tax
all
Procedural questions regarding the contribution of co-entrepreneurial shares pursuant to § 20 UmwstG
Jan 24, 2025
M&A
all
Vesting - Berlin Court of Appeal makes important decision for investors
Jan 24, 2025
Tax
all
Extended property reduction
Jan 15, 2025
Tax
all
Extended property reduction - Berlin-Brandenburg tax court - 8 K 8179/22 judgment of November 5, 2024
Jan 7, 2025
M&A
all
Sustainable M&A - legal aspects